Legal Opinion

Arrowhead Energy, Inc. v. Baron Exploration Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 29, 1996No. 86171PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HARGRAVE, Justice.

Plaintiffs have pled four causes of action against the defendants for both actual and punitive damages based on defendants’ filing of a false or incorrect completion report with the Oklahoma Corporation Commission. The first cause of action alleges that the defendant Hoke, on behalf of the defendants, intentionally, wilfully and with malice aforethought filed an erroneous well completion report with the Oklahoma Corporation Commission stating that the Lumbers # 1 Well was producing from the Mississippi Chat formation, when it was actually producing from the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tenneco Oil Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Samson Resources Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Kingwood Oil Company v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. Pelican Production Corp. v. Wishbone Oil & Gas, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
  5. Southern Union Production Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grayhorse Energy, LLC v. Crawley Petroleum Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API