Legal Opinion
Davis Walker Corp. v. Blumenthal
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 25, 1978No. Civ. A. 78-0421PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GASCH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Davis Walker Corporation and United International Corporation seek declaratory and injunctive relief with respect to the “trigger price mechanism” (TPM). Plaintiffs claim that the adoption by the Department of the Treasury (Treasury) of the TPM insofar as it pertains to steel wire rod contravenes the Antidumping Act, 19 U.S.C. §§ 160-173 (1970), as amended, (Supp.V 1975), is arbitrary and capricious in violation of section 10(e) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A), and is invalid for failure to comply with the rulemaking…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Richard Pickus v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Ethyl Corp. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Hospital Association v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, H.H.S.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Jerlian Watch Company, Inc. v. United States Department of Commerce and United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Connors Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981
- American Hospital Association v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, H.H.S.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987