Sanction of Knott v. State
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BANKS, Justice,
for the Court:
¶ 1. This case raises the issue of whether a trial court has the jurisdiction to impose sanctions upon an attorney not engaged in a proceeding before the trial court and whether the district .attorney has standing to request that the attorney be required to make monetary restitution to the county without prior approval by the attorney general. We find that the trial court did not have the jurisdiction to discipline the attorney. Nor did the district attorney have standing to seek monetary damages without prior approval from the attorney general. Accordingly we…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kennington-Saenger Theatres, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Dist. Atty.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1944
- Greaves v. Hinds CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
- Danzig v. DanzigCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- ATTORNEY BT v. Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- In re LewisMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re ByrnesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Misquez v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Greg Spore v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
- Shirley Byers v. Barbara TurnerCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
- Greg Spore v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.