Legal Opinion

State v. . Franklin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1926PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOE, J.

No exceptions were taken by "defendant to the judge’s charge to the jury. The only assignments of error relied upon by defendant upon his appeal to this Court, are based upon exceptions to the rulings of the court, during the progress of the trial, resulting in the admission or exclusion of evidence. These assignments cannot be sustained. We find no error, for which defendant is entitled to a new trial.

"Witnesses for the State were permitted to testify, over objections aptly made by defendant, as to declarations made to each of them, by deceased, after he received his fatal wounds, and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. . WhitsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. State v. . WhittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  3. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  4. State v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  5. State v. FinleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. HamletteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. State v. . DaltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. State v. . JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API