Legal Opinion
American Bank v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 4, 1974No. Nos. 74-1082, 74-1083PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
The question here presented is whether the trial court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment of the above named defendants and in holding that the action of the Comptroller in issuing a bank charter was valid and, secondly, whether the court was required to consider contentions that the bank to which the charter was issued, namely Union, was in truth a subsidiary of a bank holding company. The defendants-intervenors in this action filed an application with the Comptroller seeking approval for a proposed national bank in Tulsa, Oklahoma, on April 25,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Whitney National Bank in Jefferson Parish v. Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gravois Bank v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and Manchester Financial Corp. And the National Bank of Affton, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
3Cited by2 opinions
- City National Bank v. James E. Smith, Comptroller of Currency of the United States, Meadowbrook National BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- American Bank of Tulsa v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974