Legal Opinion

Hatcher-Powers Shoe Company v. Sparks

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 12, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Commissioner Drury

Reversing.

This is an action under section 439 of the Civil Code of Practice. The shoe company, in its petition, described with particularity lot No. 19 on Prospect avenue, Ash-land, Ky., which W. P. Sparks had, so it alleged, fraudulently conveyed to Goldie Sparks, and which the shoe company sought to subject to the payment of a judgment against W. P. Sparks. It was denied the relief it sought, and the shoe company has appealed.

We shall give here the dates of the happening of certain events of importance in the determination of this controversy: July…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McAnnulty v. McAnnultyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Richardson v. RichardsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Wesley v. WesleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. Hanson v. Buckner'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836
  5. Keady v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hays v. CyrusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API