Legal Opinion

Beamer v. Franchise Tax Board

California Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1977No. S.F. 23591PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

We consider here the deductibility under Revenue and Taxation Code section 172041 of certain taxes paid to the State of Texas by respondent taxpayers. To make this determination we must resolve two issues: (1) the proper construction of section 17204, which enumerates those taxes paid to other authorities' that are deductible from California personal income tax, and (2) whether the Texas taxes are “on or according to or measured by income or profits.” (§ 17204, subd. *470(c)(2).) We conclude that the Texas taxes cannot be characterized as taxes on income, and hence are deductible.

Th…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Union Oil Associates v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Holmes v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. CalvertTexas Supreme Court · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Weekes v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Calhoun v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Shelley v. Kendall (In Re Shelley)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. MCA, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API