Barrett v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
JUSTICE KELLER
Ricky Barrett entered a conditional guilty plea to first degree possession of a controlled substance following the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. The Court of Appeals affirmed, and this Court granted discretionary review. Barrett argues that police entered and searched his home in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Section 10 of the Kentucky Constitution. For reasons stated herein, we affirm the Court of Appeals.
I. BACKGROUND.
Covington Police received a tip from an anonymous caller that Ricky Barrett…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Clarence Kenneth GormanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CooksOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. ChavezOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Auston Stewart v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2024
- Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Christopher B. StokesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2025
- Cortes Thornton v. Commonwealth of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.