Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Wasser

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 7, 1990No. 74407PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Wasser, 545 So.2d 924 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). Having accepted review of Florida Patient’s Compensation *340Fund v. Sitomer, 524 So.2d 671 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), quashed sub nom. Smith v. Sitomer, 550 So.2d 461 (Fla.1989), which conflicted with other district court decisions, we accepted review of this case also.1 The question presented here, as in Sitomer, is whether the Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund (the Fund) or the medical doctor’s (Wilson’s) primary carrier is responsible for attorney’s fees under section 768.56, Florida Statutes…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. FLORIDA PATIENT'S COMP. FUND v. MoxleySupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. FLORIDA PATIENT'S COMP. FUND v. BouchocSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  4. Smith v. SitomerSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  5. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. WasserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Orlando Regional Med. Ctr., Inc. v. ChmielewskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. HaynesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Pinecrest Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. First Baptist Church of Cape Coral, Florida, Inc. v. Compass Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
  5. First Baptist Church of Cape Coral, Florida, Inc. v. Compass Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API