Legal Opinion

Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Pinecrest Ltd. Partnership

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 13, 1999No. 99-1018PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm the final summary judgment as the trial court properly enforced the insurance policy in accordance with its plain language and entered judgment concerning the attorney’s fee issue in favor of appellees. See Wilson v. Wasser, 562 So.2d 339 (Fla.1990); Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Bouchoc, 514 So.2d 52 (Fla.1987); Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Lamm, 218 So.2d 219 (Fla. 3d *734DCA), cert. denied, 225 So.2d 529 (Fla.1969).

Affirmed.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. FLORIDA PATIENT'S COMP. FUND v. BouchocSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Prudential Insurance Company of America v. LammDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  3. Wilson v. WasserSupreme Court of Florida · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. HaynesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001