Legal Opinion

Speckman v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided October 14, 1997No. 4:96CV3292PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PIESTER, United States Magistrate Judge.

There are a number of pending matters in this case, but because of my disposition of the first, I do not address the remaining motions at this time.

A motion has been filed by defendant for sanctions and a protective order, arising from an incident that occurred on June 18, 1997. The defendant’s motion was accompanied by documentary evidence. Plaintiff has responded to the motion by brief, and additional documentary evidence. Neither side has requested an evidentiaiy hearing. See NELR 7.1(f).

From the documents filed with the motion, I…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Perna v. Electronic Data Systems, Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
  5. Fayemi v. Hambrecht & Quist, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. George v. Industrial Maintenance Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2002
  2. (SS) Riott v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Seek Capital, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API