Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Levine

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 2004No. C-040192PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mark P. Painter, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Jayson Levine appeals his conviction for speeding in violation of Cincinnati Municipal Code 506-8. We reverse the conviction and discharge Levine.

{¶ 2} Levine was driving on the West Sixth Street viaduct in Hamilton County in February 2004. Cincinnati Police Specialist Al Gober witnessed Levine traveling faster than another car. He then used an LTI 20-20 laser device to determine that Levine was traveling at 69 miles per hour. The posted speed limit was 50 miles per hour.

{¶ 3} Gober had checked the laser unit’s calibration earlier that morning,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. HughbanksOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. DolesOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. City of Cincinnati v. DowlingOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. City of Akron v. GrayAkron Municipal Court · 1979

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. ZhovnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Beachwood v. JoynerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Brook Park v. Rodojev (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. StarksOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. Yaun, 8-07-22 (4-21-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API