Legal Opinion

State v. Hughbanks

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 2003No. 2000-0057PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} In this appeal, Gary Hughbanks Jr. (“Hughbanks”) raises 15 propositions of law. For the reasons that follow, we reject them. We have also independently weighed the aggravating circumstances against the mitigating factors and compared his sentence to those imposed in similar cases, as R.C. 2929.05(A) requires. We affirm the defendant’s convictions and sentence of death.

{¶ 2} Around 9:00 p.m. on May 13, 1987, William and Juanita Leeman returned to their home in Springfield Township in Hamilton County, Ohio. Once inside, William Leeman confronted a burglar, who proceeded to kill…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. McKnightOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. TrimbleOhio Supreme Court · 2009

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API