State v. Brown
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The defendants, Matthew A. Brown and Dana Sullivan, were charged with drug-related offenses. Brown filed a motion to suppress evidence seized at the time of his arrest, arguing that the arrest lacked probable cause. Sullivan joined in this motion. The Superior Court {Dickson, J.), after a consolidated hearing, granted the motion to suppress, which ruling the State now appeals. We reverse.
The trial court found the following facts in its order granting the motion to suppress. Dover Police Officer Thomas Stinglen received information from a confidential informant that Sullivan was involved *408in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WoodenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- State v. JaromaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- State v. GallantSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- State v. VachonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Commonwealth v. FedericiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Hartgers v. Town of PlaistowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- State v. ConantSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Nowaczyk v. North HamptonDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.