Legal Opinion
Hartgers v. Town of Plaistow
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 2, 1996No. 94-462PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.
The plaintiff, H. Bruce Hartgers, sued the defendants, the Town of Plaistow and the Plaistow Police Department, alleging that his arrest for the offense of issuing a bad check under RSA 638:4 (1986 & Supp. 1990) violated his rights under the first, fourth, fifth, and fourteenth amendments to the United States Constitution, see 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1988 (1988), and related State statutory and constitutional provisions. The Superior Court (Dickson, J.) ruled that the police had probable cause to arrest the plaintiff and granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
In August…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- James N. Gramenos v. Jewel Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- B.C.R. Transport Co., Inc. v. Norman FontaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Simpson v. CalivasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- State v. VandebogartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- State v. JaromaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ojo v. LorenzoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- KC Rental, LLC v. WMK Automotive, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
- Lattime v. Seabrook, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1999
- McCarthy v. Milford, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2004
- Nowaczyk v. North HamptonDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.