Holt v. First National Bank of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
This appeal deals with the validity of a provision in an installment sales contract whereby the purchaser of an automobile waived as against the assignee of the contract defenses which could have been asserted against the assignor-seller.' The trial court held that the assignment of the contract containing the waiver provision was unrelated to the actual sale of the automobile “in the usual sense” and that it was not “unconscionable” *458to enforce the waiver in the peculiar circumstances of the case. We agree and affirm.
In May 1967, plaintiff, Gail Holt, purchased a Dodge Charger automobile from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Unico v. OwenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Quality Finance Co. v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Fairfield Credit Corp. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- International Finance Corporation v. RiegerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Dean v. Universal CIT Credit Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
3Cited by2 opinions
- Personal Finance Co. v. MeredithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Holt v. First National Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973