Legal Opinion

Mannesmann-Sumerbank Boru Endustrisi T.A.S. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 23, 1999No. Slip Op. 99-141; Court 98-05-02185PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOLDBERG, Judge.

In this action, the Court reviews two aspects of the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube and Welded Carbon Steel Line Pipe from, Turkey; Final Results and Partial Recission of. Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 63 Fed.Reg. 18,885 (April 16, 1998)- (“Final Results”)- Specifically, Mannesmann-Sumerbank Boru Endustri-si T.A.S., Borusan Birlesik Boru Fabri-kalari A.S., and Borusan Ithalat Ve Da-gitim A.S. (“plaintiffs”) complain that Commerce (1) countervailed benefits under the Freight Rebate Program on the date of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Floral Trade Council v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
  3. Cinsa, S.A. de C.V. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  4. Cultivos Miramonte S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  5. AK Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mannesmann-Sumerbank Boru Endustrisi T.A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API