State v. Penrod
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the Scioto County Court of Common Pleas denying the motion of Leonard Penrod, movant below and appellant herein, for an award of postjudgment interest. 1 Appellant assigns the following errors for our review 2 :
I. “In an action commenced pursuant to former [R.C.] 2933.41 the action is civil in form and [the] real party in interest is the person or entity that ultimately receives or attempts to receive the item subject to the action not the State of Ohio.”
II. “Pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Section 1343.03, the Appellant, Leonard Penrod, is entitled…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pritz v. MesserOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. LilliockOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Zugravu v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 1935
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Bowman v. Columbiana County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Bowman v. Columbiana Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- Ohio Department of Natural Resources v. HughesOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- LUNSFORD v. LUNSFORDCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2019