State ex rel. Bowman v. Columbiana County Board of Commissioners
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) provides that in original actions other than habeas corpus filed in this court that “[a]fter the time for filing an answer to the complaint or a motion to dismiss, the Supreme Court will either dismiss the case or issue an alternative or peremptory writ, if a writ has not already been issued.”
Respondents seek dismissal of relators’ complaint for a writ of mandamus pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6). Dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted is appropriate if, after all factual allegations of the complaint are presumed true and all…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. SchroederOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Smith v. FrostOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Hawkins v. Pickaway County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Cincinnati v. SmallwoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Weiss v. HooverOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. Hancock County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Lanham v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Stern v. MascioOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Arnett v. WinemillerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.