Legal Opinion
Baldwin v. Benson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 28, 1978No. Nos. 77-1739, 77-1794PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
The question here presented is whether a person who is charged with violation of parole is entitled, as a matter of right, to appointed counsel in parole revocation proceedings before both the Commission and court, under 18 U.S.C. § 4214. Both of these defendants have been charged with parole violation and in the applicable proceedings have had parole revoked following hearings in both cases. This is the only question raised in the appeal of William Baldwin.
The case of John M. Espinoza is an appeal from the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus which…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Charles Curtis Harris v. Irl Day, Warden United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Edward John Walker v. Ray McLain Sheriff of Lincoln County, OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Gary Michael Rutledge v. Jerry SunderlandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Hooper v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.