Legal Opinion
Henzel v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided March 18, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00529Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 In re J&J Investment Litigation ) Case No.: 2:22-cv-00529-GMN-NJK 4 ) ) ORDER 5 6 Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 39), filed by Defendant 7 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”). Plaintiffs Barrett Henzel, et. al., (“Plaintiffs”) filed a 8 Response, (ECF No. 45), to which Wells Fargo filed a Reply, (ECF No. 52). For the reasons 9 discussed below, Wells Fargo’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in 10 part. 11 I. BACKGROUND 12 This case arises from the fallout of a Ponzi scheme that ended with an…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.