Legal Opinion

In re Austerlitz

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1981No. Appeal, No. 2818 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Appellants Alexander, Mack, DeRiggi and Myers petitioned the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County to intervene in a civil service appeal brought by other police officers, pursuant to which the court had ordered appellants’ promotions in the Penn Hills police department rescinded. Appellants sought a rule to vacate the order. After hearing argument, Judge Staisey denied intervention and discharged the rule.

In June, 1979, the Municipality of Penn Hills had instituted testing procedures for promotion of applicants to the rank of police lieutenant. In that same month,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. Diamond Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Tigue v. BASALYGASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. McGrath v. StaiseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. In re Change of Boundaries and/or Election Districts of Five (5) WardsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Rybak EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Trosky v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. MacK v. Municipality of Penn HillsDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Peoples National Bank v. NobleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Cullura v. School District of Bristol TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Cullura v. School District of Bristol TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API