Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cullura v. School District of Bristol Township

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 1992No. 3 C.D. 1991Published

1DissentBarbieri, Senior Judge

Because I disagree with the majority’s holding, I must respectfully dissent.

It is my belief that our Supreme Court has already decided the issue of whether a promoted public employee is an indispensable party to litigation disputing that promotion. In McGrath v. Staisey, 433 Pa. 8, 249 A.2d 280 (1968), our Supreme Court held that improperly appointed or promoted public employees, despite their potential interest in suits brought by colleagues disputing their appointment or promotion, are not indispensable parties to the litigation.

Indeed, this Court, in Appeal of Austerlitz, 63 Pa.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGrath v. StaiseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. In re AusterlitzCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Jefferson County Assistance Office, Department of Public Welfare v. WolfeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API