Sperduto v. New York City Interborough Railway Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 9, 1919, reversing what it considered a determination of the state industrial commission. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcLaughlin, J.
The respondent is, and during the - times referred to was, a self-insurer under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Some time prior to the 6th of March, 1918, one Angelo Sperduto, while in its employ, received an injury which .resulted. in his death, for which, on the 14th of March, 1918, an award of compensation was made to his widow and dependents. The award directed that certain payments be made, per week, to the widow during widowhood, and to the dependents during dependency.
On the 21st of May, 1918, the Commission passed a resolution to the effect that every mutual compensation insurance…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Claim of Vukel v. New York Water & Sewer Mains, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Ashley v. Ware Shoals Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Claim of Brophy v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Claim of Kraemer v. Mergenthaler Linotype Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Claim of O'Connell v. Adirondack Electric Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.