Legal Opinion

Claim of Brophy v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, P. J.

The Industrial Board has assumed jurisdiction to determine the right of a non-insured employer to have returned a portion of a commuted award paid into the aggregate trust fund, created and held under section 27 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The award was for the benefit of a widow and she remarried within about three months after the payment into the fund. This appeal on stipulated facts is from a decision by the Board denying the application on the merits. Appellant, on September 27, 1932, paid $7,865.75 into the fund on account of an award of $10,386 weekly made in November, 1931, to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adrico Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Peyser v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. HellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Claim of Adams v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  5. Matter of Adams v. . New York, Ontario and W. Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Miller v. SPRINGS COTTON MILLSSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  2. Claim of Vukel v. New York Water & Sewer Mains, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Skakandy v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1946
  4. Claim of Brophy v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. McDonnell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API