Noe v. Meadows

Opinion op the Court by

Commissioner Tinsley

Affirming.

Appellee recovered damages against appellants in the sum of $500 on account of an alleged false imprisonment. To reverse the judgment against them, appellants complain, first, that they were entitled to a peremptory instruction; second, that instructions Nos. 1, 2, and 3 are erroneous; and, third, that the verdict is flagrantly against the evidence, and is excessive.

Counsel for appellee filed in this court a motion to strike the transcript of evidence from the record, on the ground that it was not filed at the term of court at which the…