Rahm v. King Wrought-Iron Bridge Manufactory
Supreme Court of Kansas
Motion for Rehearing. This case was decided at the January Term 1876 of this court, ante, p. 277, where a full statement of the facts will be found. A judgment of affirmance having been entered, Eahm, plaintiff below and plaintiff in error, filed a motion for a rehearing. Said motion was heard, and is now decided.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brewer, J.:
Since the filing of the opinion in this case the plaintiff has filed a motion for a rehearing, challenging the propositions laid down by this court in the third paragraph of the syllabus, (ante, p. 277,) and contending that in consequence of the errors therein the decision of the case was also erroneous. That paragraph is as follows:
“ Where the indorsement of the note is in blank, and without date, and the allegation of the petition that it was indorsed before due is denied in the answer, and there is no evidence as to the date of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. Sac CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Pinkerton v. BaileyNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- Mobley v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
- James v. . ChalmersNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Hall v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gross v. FunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Reynolds v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Winfield National Bank v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Lyon v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Ecton v. HarlanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.