Legal Opinion
United States v. Antrim
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 24, 2004No. 03-1558PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYR, Senior Circuit Judge.
Following the entry of a conditional guilty plea to a single count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, defendant-appellant John R. Antrim challenges the district court ruling which rejected his motion to suppress certain evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant from his residence. As we discern no error, we affirm the district court judgment.
I
BACKGROUND
We view the record facts in the light most favorable to the district court’s decision to deny Antrim’s motion to suppress the evidence. See United States v. Kimball, 25 F.3d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1994). On October…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. James H. Spikes (96-3899) Marilyn Smith (96-3660)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Michael J. Green and Cheryl Poulsen v. Marlo Butler, David Carroll, Mark SalsberryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. SanchezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- United States v. BaskinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MousliCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.