Scott v. Sisco
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCoopeb, C. J.
This is an appeal by appellant from the trial court’s denial of his motion for a new trial.
Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal with supporting briefs on the grounds that appellant failed to comply with Rule 2-17 (e) of the Rules of the Supreme Court by failing to contain, under the heading of “Argument,” a specification of each cause in the motion for a new trial which is intended to be urged. After appellee’s motion to dismiss was filed, appellant was granted leave to amend his brief as provided for under Rule 2-20 of the Supreme Court. Appellant, by interlineation, amended…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taylor v. FitzpatrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Day v. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Acme-Evans Co. v. SchnepfIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938
- Acme-Evans Co. v. SchnepfIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
- McKinnon v. ParrillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Indianapolis Transit System, Inc. v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- GTE North Inc. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Tax Court · 1994
- Deming Hotel Company v. ProxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
- Frankfort v. OwensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- McCraney v. KuechenbergIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.