Day v. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.
This action was instituted by the appellant against the appellee, to recover $6,000 damages which he alleges he sustained in and by an alleged personal injury inflicted on him through the negligence of the appellee and without the fault of appellant.
There was a jury trial at the special term; verdict for appellee, whereon judgment followed over a motion for a new trial. On appeal, the general term affirmed the judment of the special term.
It is assigned for error in this court that the general term erred in affirming the judgment of the special term.
The error complained of in the general term,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Dodge v. GaylordIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Purcell v. EnglishIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. DaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Worster v. CaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Scott v. KruegerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. BarkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Devine v. Grace Construction and Supply Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1962
- Anderson v. Inland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.