Legal Opinion

McNaughton v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 28, 1998No. 1961708PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEE, Justice.

Cindy L. McNaughton, the plaintiff in an action pending in the Jefferson Circuit Court, petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the circuit court to vacate its order compelling the arbitration of her claims against the defendant United Healthcare Services, Inc. (“United”). McNaughton maintains that arbitration is inappropriate because the arbitration clause contained in her employee handbook and relied on by the trial court is not part of a legally binding contract. In the alternative, McNaughton argues that the arbitration clause is void under the doctrine of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cheek v. United Healthcare of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. American General Finance, Inc. v. ManleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Cheek v. United Healthcare of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Cheek v. United Healthcare of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API