Cheek v. United Healthcare of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1DissentHarrell, Judge
I respectfully dissent. I do so because, in my view, the arbitration agreement between Appellant, Ronnie E. Cheek (“Cheek”), and Appellee, United Health Care of the Mid-*162Atlantic, Inc., (“United”), was supported by consideration. Even assuming, arguendo, that the arbitration agreement was not supported by consideration independent from that of the employment contract of which it was a part, the consideration supporting the employment contract supported the arbitration agreement as well. Reasonably construed, the parties’ mutual obligations with regard to arbitration were not illusory.…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Diane Blair v. Scott Specialty Gases Thomas Barford Jerry StumpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- International Paper Company v. Schwabedissen Maschinen & Anlagen GmbhCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.