Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cheek v. United Healthcare of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 13, 2003No. 141, Sept. Term, 2002Published

1DissentHarrell, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I do so because, in my view, the arbitration agreement between Appellant, Ronnie E. Cheek (“Cheek”), and Appellee, United Health Care of the Mid-*162Atlantic, Inc., (“United”), was supported by consideration. Even assuming, arguendo, that the arbitration agreement was not supported by consideration independent from that of the employment contract of which it was a part, the consideration supporting the employment contract supported the arbitration agreement as well. Reasonably construed, the parties’ mutual obligations with regard to arbitration were not illusory.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Diane Blair v. Scott Specialty Gases Thomas Barford Jerry StumpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  3. International Paper Company v. Schwabedissen Maschinen & Anlagen GmbhCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  4. Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API