Stowe v. State

Jonathan A. Stowe contends multiple convictions and sentences for possession of child pornography based on his possession of a single proscribed item violate constitutional prohibitions against double jeopardy. We accept this contention, reverse the convictions and sentences that constitute double jeopardy, and remand for resen-tencing on the remaining convictions. But we reject — on the authority of Rogers v. State, 33 So.3d 805, 806 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)—appellant’s argument that the trial court did not have jurisdiction, pursuant to section 943.0435, Florida Statutes (2006), to designate him…