Legal Opinion
Farnum v. Bankers & Shippers Insurance Co. of New York
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 3, 1933PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.
The plaintiff brought suit alleging that, on July 7, 1931, his automobile was stolen, and that the defendant, which had issued to Uxbridge, Auto Company a policy insuring the owner of the car against “theft, robbery and pilferage,” was liable to him. After verdict for the *366plaintiff, the case is before us upon the defendant’s bill of exceptions. The bill is not clear. It is difficult to ascertain what exceptions were claimed. An objection is not an exception. Unless exception is claimed, an objection to a ruling, a direction or a course of conduct on the part of the trial judge will not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Merrimac Chemical Co. v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- William Gilligan Co. v. CaseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Bloom v. Ohio Farmers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Lunn & Sweet Co. v. WolfmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Huey v. PassarelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Stern v. LiebermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Bridges v. HartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Members of Bakery & Confectionery Workers International Union of America v. Hall Baking Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Morris Feinberg, Treasurer v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
- Rich v. United Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.