Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Thompson

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1937PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Schenck, J

The plaintiff brings this action for partition of real property of which his father, George D. Thompson, Sr., died seised. The defendant Mary J. Thompson is the widow of the decedent, the other defendants being a daughter and son and the executors under his last will and testament. The will was executed in 1933 and makes no provision for the defendant Mary J. Thompson, the widow. The real question here presented is whether the widow has the right of election pursuant to the provisions of section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law.

From the evidence presented at the trial it appears that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Malloney v. . HoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. In Re the Estate of BurridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. In re the Estate of GreenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  4. Mirizio v. MirizioNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Powers v. PowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of FredenthalNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
  2. In re the Estate of McGloneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  3. Schoonmaker v. CrounseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. In re the Construction of the Will of Van HoeckeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  5. In re the Probate of the Will of CoteNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API