Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Fredenthal

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 27, 1960PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph A. Cox, S.

Proceedings have been brought to determine the validity and effect of the widow’s exercise of her right of election, the extent of the claim of the decedent’s infant son against the estate under the provisions for his support made in a separation agreement, and the right of the said son to share in the estate, as an after-born child, by reason of the provisions of section 26 of the Decedent Estate Law.

The decedent executed his last will and testament on August 13,1944 and by its terms bequeathed his entire estate to his two then living children. The decedent and the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wilson v. . HinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. In Re the Estate of MaidenNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. In Re the Estate of McGloneNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Kernochan v. . MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Barnes v. KlugAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Estate of CrawfordNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970
  2. In re the Estate of RosenbaumNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
  3. Smith v. PhelpsTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  4. In re the Estate of StoegerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  5. In Re Estate of Ayala, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API