Legal Opinion

Wilson Distilling Co. v. Foust Distilling Co.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1943No. Civil Action No. 1163PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, District Judge.

This is a proceeding for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts of the United States, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

By summons and complaint filed in this court, the plaintiff, a corporation of the State of Maryland, brings this action against the defendant, a corporation of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, alleging, inter alia, illegal retention by defendant of two hundred and eighty-five (285) barrels of rye whiskey stored in defendant’s warehouse and for which defendant issued six (6) negotiable warehouse…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Klock Produce Co. v. Diamond Ice & Storage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Metropolitan Commercial Corp. v. Larkin Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  3. Schenley Distillers Corp. v. Kinsey Distilling Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hunter-Wilson Distilling Co. v. Foust Distilling Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Wilson Distilling Co. v. Foust Distilling Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Harbor View Marine Corp. v. Braudy. In Re Pearl Fisheries, IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
  4. Harbor View Marine Corp. v. Braudy. In Re Pearl Fisheries, IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API