Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 10, 1958No. 577PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, C. J.

This appeal presents in the main two questions:

1. Is the evidence offered upon the trial in Superior Court, when considered in the light most favorable to the State, giving to the State the benefit of every reasonable intendment thereon, and every reasonable inference therefrom, as is done in testing its probative value on motion to nonsuit, sufficient to take the case to the jury on the first degree murder charge in compliance with the statute G.S. 14-17?

In this connection it is appropriate to recur to applicable principles of law.

In S. v. Hawkins, 214 N.C. 326, 199 S.E. 284, the principles…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. State v. MaultsbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  3. Burnett v. Wilmington, Newbern & Norfolk Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Gregg v. . Mallett.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. MorrinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. FerdinandoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API