Seagrave v. Lacy
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 235, Oct. T., 1904, from O. P. No. 3, Phila. Co. Motion to quash appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This is a motion to quash the defendant’s appeal from the order of the common pleas discharging his rule to show cause why judgment entered in a amicable action of ejectment under a warrant in a lease should not be opened. The motion is founded on the following waiver contained in the lease: “ The said lease hereby releases to the said lessor all errors and defects whatsoever in entering such action or judgment, or in any proceeding thereon, or concerning the same; and hereby agrees that no writ of error or objection or exception shall be made or taken thereto.” In Groll v.…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Curry v. Bacharach Quality Shops, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp. v. PottsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Consumers Mining Co. v. ChatakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- International Harvester Co. of America v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Isman v. NiedermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.