Legal Opinion

Consumers Mining Co. v. Chatak

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1927No. Appeal 535PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

On March 9, 1925, Smaile Chatak, appellant herein and defendant in the court below, was in the employ of the Consumers Mining Company, the appellee. On that date the parties executed as lessee and lessor respectively a lease for a house and lot owned by appellee and this appeal is from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County refusing to grant a rule to show cause why a judgment entered in an amicable action of ejectment, under authority alleged to be contained in the lease, should not be stricken oif. The lease was from month to month and contained…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Curry v. Bacharach Quality Shops, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Clarion, M. & P. R. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Seagrave v. LacySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Hutchinson v. LedlieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  5. Post v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Grakelow v. KidderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Sterle v. Galiardi Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Markeim-Chalmers-Ludington, Inc. v. MeadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Gilberton Coal Co. v. SchusterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Polis v. Raphael Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API