Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Enomoto
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 4, 1990No. Nos. 89-16335, 89-16420PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
California state prison officials appeal the district court’s order modifying a 1980 consent decree between prison officials and a class of individually named inmates sentenced to death by the State of California and housed at San Quentin Prison. The inmates cross-appeal, opposing a particular section of the court’s modification of the decree. We affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Maurice Thompson and other inmates sentenced to death (“Inmates”) in the California State Prison at San Quentin commenced this civil rights action on July 6, 1979, against prison officials of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. StottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Raymond Washington v. Clayton PenwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Bishop Collins v. Gerald ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Robert O. Gilmore, Jr., and Inmates of San Quentin State Prison, United States of America, Intervenor v. People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- Gates v. RowlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Edward Leroy Smith v. George Sumner George Deeds John IgnacioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Asarco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.