Legal Opinion
Optigenex, Inc. v. Wolfson Berg Limited
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided April 10, 2020No. 3:17-cv-00689Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-00689-GNS OPTIGENEX, INC. PLAINTIFF v. FDL FULFILLMENT SERVICES UG, and JOHN DOES Numbers 1 through 99 DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant FDL Fulfillment Services UG (DN 52). The motion is now ripe for adjudication. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Optigenex, Inc. (“Optigenex”) asserts federal law claims of trademark infringement, direct patent…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Salinger v. ColtingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- A&h Sportswear, Inc Mainstream Swimsuits, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc. Victoria's Secret Catalogue, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Audi Ag and Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Bob D'amato, D/B/A Quattro EnthusiastsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Herman Miller, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Palazzetti Imports and Exports, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.