Legal Opinion

Flowing Wells School District v. Stewart

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 27, 1972No. 2 CA-CIV 1167PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge.

The appellee Ann Stewart was employed as a school teacher in the Flowing Wells School District. It is undisputed that she was a certified teacher employed under a contract in the school district as a full-time classroom teacher and had been so employed in the district under a contract which had been renewed for at least the last four consecutive years. Mrs. Stewart was, therefore, a “continuing teacher” as that term is defined in A.R.S. § 15-251, subsec. A, par. 2.

Mrs. Stewart was first given a written notice of suspension on November 25, 1970. A hearing on the suspension was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Board of EducationArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Tempe Union High School Dist. v. HopkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Chandler v. HorneOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Palicka v. Ruth Fisher Sch. Dist. No. 90 of Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Board of Education of Tempe Union High School v. LammleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  2. Wayne County Board of Education v. TooleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Tsakiris v. Phoenix Union High School SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. Indian Oasis School District No. 40 & Board of Trustees v. ZambranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  5. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF NOGALES, ETC. v. CartierCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API