Legal Opinion

Tempe Union High School Dist. v. Hopkins

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1953No. 5765PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHELPS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment ordering a peremptory writ of mandamus against appellant and from an order denying its motion for a new trial. Appellee and appellant will be hereinafter referred to as plaintiff and defendant respectively.

The facts are that on March 14, 1952, plaintiff was employed as a teacher by defendant and was certified as a “probationary teacher” under the provisions of chapter 52, Session Laws of 1949, sections 54 — 1009 to 54 — 1018, inclusive A.C.A.1939, Cum.Supp. 1952. She was about to complete her third year as such teacher and if her contract had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fresno City High School District v. De CaristoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Blalock v. RidgwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Comstock v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Reed v. Board of Education of Monterey Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Board of EducationArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. School District No. 6 of Pima County v. BarberArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  3. School District No. 8, Pinal County v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Hurst v. Bisbee Unified School District No. TwoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. Chesley v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API