Legal Opinion

Terasaka v. AT & T

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 6, 2005No. COA04-1572PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALABRIA, Judge.

AT&T (“defendant”) appeals the award of the North Carolina Industrial Commission (the “Commission”) granting benefits to Amy Terasaka (“plaintiff’) based on a diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. We reverse.

On 14 February 2002, plaintiff filed a Form 18 alleging she developed pain in both of her hands on or about 17 October 2001 while typing during an intense three-day customer service representative training course. In response, defendant filed a Form 61 denying plaintiffs claim. At the time, plaintiff was in her early forties and had consistently worked in the secretarial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Russell v. Lowes Product DistributionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Saums v. Raleigh Community HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Demery v. Converse, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lathon v. Cumberland CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Helfrich v. Coca-cola Bottling Co. ConsolidatedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Newnam v. New Hanover Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Goodson v. MAFCO HOLDINGS, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Lathon v. Cumberland CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API