Tyer v. Leggett

There is no appeal from the verdict and judgment in the first cause of action.

The plaintiff insists that her motion for judgment on the pleadings in the second cause of action should have been allowed. She contends the answer is evasive and that it is impossible to determine which allegations in the complaint are admitted and which are denied, and, as a consequence, she was entitled to judgment in the court below for want of an answer.

It appears from the record that before the introduction of any evidence in the trial below, the plaintiff moved to strike the defendant’s answer as to the…