Legal Opinion
State v. Davis
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided March 16, 2006No. E2003-02162-SC-R11-CDPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
Opinion
2Opinion of the Court · BarkerWilliam M. Barker, C.J.
in which E. RILEY ANDERSON and JANICE M. HOLDER, JJ, joined. ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., J., filed a dissenting opinion. CORNELIA A. CLARK, J„ not participating.
*340We granted the defendant permission to appeal to consider whether the exact copy requirement of Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(c)1 applies to an affidavit that has been incorporated by reference into a search warrant. Upon consideration, we hold that the exact copy requirement expressly applies to search warrants only and does not apply to incorporated affidavits. The record supports the trial court’s finding that the…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. HenningTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. ElkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
- United States v. Roy C. Blakeney (90-5664), Kenneth A. Kutnyak (90-5665), and James E. Box (90-6041)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Hampton v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Angela Faye DanielTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
- State of Tennessee v. Anthony Jerome MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 2019
- State of Tennessee v. Angela Faye DanielCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
- State v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- United States v. LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006