Legal Opinion

State of Tennessee v. Angela Faye Daniel

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 2018No. M2015-01073-SC-R11-CDPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY S. BIVINS, CHIEF JUSTICE

We granted permission to appeal in this case in order to determine whether the exclusionary rule should be applied to a blood sample drawn from an individual pursuant to a search warrant because the arresting officer failed to leave a copy of the warrant with the individual. The Defendant, Angela Faye Daniel, was arrested for driving under the influence. The arresting officer obtained a search warrant and transported the Defendant to a medical facility for a blood draw. The officer failed to give the Defendant a copy of the search warrant. The trial court…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Tina Marie Hodge v. Chadwick CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. City of West Covina v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. MusiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. State v. MallardTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State of Tennessee v. Lemaricus Devall DavidsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Charlotte Lynn Frazier And Andrea ParksTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State of Tennessee v. A.B. Price, Jr. and Victor SimsTennessee Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. McElrathTennessee Supreme Court · 2019
  4. STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER MCLAWHORNCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2020
  5. State of Tennessee v. Jerome Antonio McElrath - Concurring In the suppression of evidence dissenting from the adoption of an exclusionary rule exception for constitutional violations caused by careless police recordkeepingTennessee Supreme Court · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API