Legal Opinion

Brydon v. Brydon

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1961No. 3010PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McINTYRE

The only question presented on appeal in this case is whether the district court erred in denying a divorce to the plaintiff, Ruth Brydon, and in dismissing the divorce action at the close of her evidence. She contends that the motion to dismiss should not have been granted if there is in the trial record any substantial evidence that the defendant was chargeable with any one of the three grounds for divorce asserted by her.

Whatever the better practice may have been prior to the adoption of the Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure with respect to a motion to dismiss at the close of plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boschetto v. BoschettoWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Gill v. GillWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Dawson v. DawsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Jegendorf v. JegendorfWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Mahoney v. MahoneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kure v. Chevrolet Motor DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Clauss v. ClaussWyoming Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Piner v. PinerWyoming Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Eisenbarth v. EisenbarthWyoming Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API