Legal Opinion

Wentworth & Irwin, Inc. v. United States National Bank

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 6, 1986No. A8302-01282; CA A32142PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

This action to replevy 23 automobiles involves a priority dispute between two creditors of Heinrich Motors (Heinrich), an automobile dealership. The trial court entered judgment for defendant, notwithstanding the jury verdict for plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals, and defendant cross-appeals. We affirm on the appeal, and the cross-appeal thereby becomes moot.

Plaintiff is in the business of leasing new cars and trucks. In September and October, 1981, it “purchased” and contemporaneously leased back to Heinrich 25 new Datsun automobiles. Plaintiff contends that it thereby acquired a lessor’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. All-States Leasing Co. v. OchsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. Peco, Inc. v. Hartbauer Tool & Die Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Crooks v. Pay Less Drug Stores Northwest, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Owens v. HaugCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Pac West Auction Co. v. Falk Farms, Inc. (In Re Falk Farms, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API